The Shifting Battlegrounds of Sudan: The Intensifying Fight for Control Between the RSF and the Army

The conflict in Sudan has been raging for over two years, with no clear end in sight. The battle for control between the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the Sudanese army has been a complex and ever-evolving struggle, with the map of who controls what constantly shifting. In this in-depth blog post, we'll delve into the intricacies of this conflict, exploring the key battlegrounds, the strategies employed by both sides, and the impact on the Sudanese people.

The Battleground Shifts to the West and Central Regions

As the conflict has progressed, the main battleground has shifted to the western and central regions of Sudan. The RSF, a powerful paramilitary force, has been able to maintain control over much of Darfur, parts of northwestern and southern Cordovan, as well as a border triangle between Sudan, Libya, and Egypt. Meanwhile, the Sudanese army and its allied factions have been able to control the rest of the country.

The battle for the city of Alubay, the capital of the northern Cordovan state, has been a particularly fierce one.

The RSF fighters have been feeling triumphant after ambushing and killing Sudanese army soldiers outside the city. However, the very next day, the same RSF group was ambushed in a revenge attack by the Sudanese army. This pattern of attack and counterattack has been a hallmark of the conflict, with neither side able to gain a decisive advantage.

The Sudanese Army's Strategy: Slow but Steady Advances

The Sudanese army has been employing a long-term strategy in its efforts to regain control. According to experts within the Sudanese armed forces, the army is working with a well-thought-out plan aimed at leading the enemy to complete exhaustion. This strategy involves slow but steady advances, with the army ensuring its own protection before moving forward.

The army's slow progress can be attributed to several factors. The distances between the key cities of Alasir and Kadugi, and the capital Khartoum, are vast, and the terrain is flat and exposed. The army needs to ensure its own safety and supply lines before it can make significant advances. This cautious approach has been met with criticism from some, who argue that the army is not doing enough to break the deadlock.

However, the army maintains that its strategy is working. They point to the fact that the RSF's control over the states of Khartoum, Jazzer, Sinnar, the White Nile, and Cordovan has now considerably shrunk. The army believes that its slow but steady advances will eventually lead to victory.

The RSF's Strongholds and Siege Tactics

The RSF, on the other hand, has been able to maintain control over key areas, particularly in Darfur. The group and its allied factions currently control most of Darfur, as well as parts of northwestern and southern Cordovan, and the border triangle between Sudan, Libya, and Egypt.

The RSF has been employing siege tactics,

besieging the last remaining army strongholds in El Faser, the capital of North Darfur, as well as in Kadugi, the capital of the state of South Kanan, and in the city of Delenge to the north of it. This strategy of encircling and cutting off the army's supply lines has been a significant challenge for the Sudanese forces.

The Human Toll and the Humanitarian Disaster

The ongoing conflict in Sudan has taken a devastating toll on the civilian population. The fighting between the RSF and the army has resulted in a humanitarian disaster, with thousands of lives lost and countless more displaced from their homes.

According to the United Nations, the conflict has led to the displacement of over 2.5 million people, with many seeking refuge in neighboring countries or within Sudan itself. The situation has been further exacerbated by the disruption of essential services, such as healthcare and education, as well as the destruction of infrastructure and the disruption of food supplies.

The international community has been calling for an end to the violence and a peaceful resolution to the conflict. However, the entrenched positions of both the RSF and the army, as well as the complex web of alliances and rivalries, have made it difficult to find a lasting solution.

The conflict in Sudan is a complex and multifaceted struggle, with the battle for control between the RSF and the Sudanese army constantly shifting the battlegrounds. While the army's strategy of slow but steady advances has had some success, the RSF's siege tactics and control over key regions have made it difficult to achieve a decisive victory.

The human toll of this conflict has been devastating, with thousands of lives lost and millions displaced. The international community must continue to pressure both sides to find a peaceful resolution and end the violence that has plagued the Sudanese people for far too long.

Thanks for your attention 

Follow Sawt Al Islam